Institutional Economics

Institutional Economics

Share this post

Institutional Economics
Institutional Economics
Drying paint or boiling water? The effects of QT revisited

Drying paint or boiling water? The effects of QT revisited

Plus, Australia’s net capital exports

Stephen Kirchner
Mar 08, 2024
∙ Paid
1

Share this post

Institutional Economics
Institutional Economics
Drying paint or boiling water? The effects of QT revisited
2
2
Share

RBA Assistant Governor Chris Kent recently told parliament that the effects of quantitative tightening would be as exciting as watching paint dry (channeling Janet Yellen’s June 2017 FOMC press conference) or grass grow, while RBA Governor Michelle Bullock has characterised those effects as ‘marginal.’ A new cross-country study of QT (FT op-ed version here) finds that it ‘has had more of an impact than “paint drying”, but far less than simply reversing the effects of quantitative easing.’ The results are not inconsistent with Bullock’s ‘marginal’ characterisation, but as it happens, the largest impact from the QT programs observed internationally to date is in Australia.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Stephen Kirchner
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share